Thursday 11/12/15 brain dump
8:30 General session panel – teachers, science & societal controversy
Ken Miller on teaching evolution.
Watch “Judgement Day” documentary on intelligent design (Nova). Read: Alan Leshner – “Bridging the opinion gap” (Science).
Bombarding people with facts doesn’t work. Information is not the key, in fact it may harden views. The problem is “cultural cognition” an unwillingness of people to identify with the scientific community because of a number of ingrained beliefs/practices (Dan Kahan).
– cultural connections to science matter.
– Is there hope? When you look at an age related breakdown, there IS. Young people are much more accepting of evolution.
Jacquelyne Gill – paleoecology at University of Maine
How did ecosystems respond to climate change in the past, and how can that inform what may happen in the future. (Forensics for the environment)
Communication requires an empathic connection. As scientists, we’re trained in factual defense, and this isn’t really the best way to go about it. Many people tend to reject the Consensus Model (statements like “97% scientists agree”). It’s not going to convince anyone. In fact, it’s important to recognize that many ideological differences are really about government and how much regulation we’re comfortable with.
In talking with people, “make an incremental push in the realm of trust.” This was a terrific talk.
Seth Mnookin – on vaccination – Putting his book “The Panic Virus” onto the stack
Do you make decisions based on emotions or truth? Both. First, find out the truth, the reality (as a journalist)
Emotions run the opposition. And the way to counter that is not by attacking it, but by an empathic connection. You can’t convince the conspiracy theorists. This connects with what Jacquelyn said. Make “I” statements about what works for you based on research.
I’m going to read this book.